"The Blind Side," the 2009 film based on the life of Michael Oher, an African American football player, has been celebrated for its heartwarming portrayal of an underprivileged young man finding a brighter path through the generosity of a caring family. However, it is critical to look beyond the story's emotional pull and scrutinize the narrative that the film chooses to perpetuate.

First and foremost, the movie centers its white characters, making them the story's heroes. Leigh Anne Tuohy, portrayed by Sandra Bullock, is at the center of the film, and we are invited to invest in her journey, emotions, and actions. This narrative device, where white characters are portrayed as the rescuers of black individuals, insidiously implies an inherent inability of black people to succeed without white intervention. In this framework, we must ask, who is this story about? Is it about Michael Oher, or is it about the white family that took him in? And what does that say about whose stories are valued and why?

"The Blind Side" crafts a narrative where Michael Oher seemingly waits for a white savior rather than being a fully realized individual with his agency and intellect. This portrayal subtly communicates a harmful stereotype— that black individuals are in constant need, waiting for white individuals to come and elevate their circumstances. When we consider the historical and current context in which black people have been marginalized and stereotyped, the implications of this portrayal are deeply problematic.

Furthermore, the film does not engage in any meaningful exploration of systemic and structural inequalities. There is little to no commentary on the social, economic, and political systems that create the disparities we see on screen. By individualizing Michael's story and framing his success as primarily the result of the Tuohys' kindness, the film avoids the uncomfortable realities of systemic racism, poverty, and educational inequality that plague America.

Moreover, the feel-good narrative of "The Blind Side" may allow white viewers to feel as though they are engaging with issues of race and inequality without confronting their privilege or complicity in systemic racism. The story provides a comfortable, contained narrative of racial harmony and progress, offering a sense of satisfaction and closure that could deter more profound engagement with these significant issues.

Additionally, the film simplifies and, in some instances, erases Michael's cultural background and experiences. His assimilation into a white family's lifestyle is depicted as almost entirely positive, without any nuanced exploration of what it might mean for him to navigate two vastly different cultural worlds. The absence of this perspective in the film is a missed opportunity to delve into the complex realities of transracial adoption and fostering, which, while often enriching, come with their unique challenges and potential for cultural erasure.

It's also essential to recognize the broader impact of films like "The Blind Side" on the individuals whose stories are portrayed. Michael Oher himself has expressed discomfort with how the film represents him. It has reportedly had a tangible impact on his life and career, as people began to see him through the simplified character lens, not as a multifaceted human being. This effect underlines filmmakers' profound power and responsibility when telling someone else's story, mainly when that person belongs to a historically marginalized group.

In sum, while "The Blind Side" may pull at our heartstrings and lead us to believe we are engaging in a narrative of progress and unity, it is crucial to approach it with a critical lens. Only then can we unravel the broader cultural messages it sends and reflect on how these messages interact with our society's complex realities of race, privilege, and representation.

In a world where cinema is a powerful tool in shaping public perception, we must advocate for stories that are authentically representative and engage profoundly and respectfully with the lives and cultures they portray rather than those that serve to comfort viewers without challenging them to confront the deeper realities of systemic inequality.

A Responsibility to Truth and Context

At its core, "The Blind Side" is based on a true story – one man's incredible journey to professional football. Michael Oher's life is a tale of resilience and determination; his story could inspire millions. However, how the story is presented in the film raises critical questions about who gets to tell these stories and how they are framed.

One aspect of the film that stands out is the lack of voice and agency accorded to Michael Oher himself. Throughout the movie, his character often seems passive, with decisions about his life, future, and even his body made by others, mainly his white caregivers. This dynamic subtly reinforces a perception of dependency and lacks acknowledgment of Oher's strength, intellect, and determination. This framing does a disservice not only to Oher but also to viewers, who are denied the opportunity to fully appreciate the wealthy, complex individual at the center of this narrative.

Moreover, "The Blind Side" capitalizes on a black man's life story while significantly benefiting the predominantly white filmmakers and audience without necessarily creating space or opportunity for black voices and perspectives. This dynamic can be seen as a form of cultural commodification, where a black person's life story is crafted into a narrative that appeals to white emotional sensibilities while contributing minimally, if at all, to challenging systemic issues or supporting the black community.

Another striking aspect is the film's portrayal of white characters as virtuous and black as problematic or peripheral. The white characters in the film are often portrayed as well-intentioned, benevolent, and moral, while the few black characters aside from Oher are generally depicted in a negative or trivial light. This dichotomy subtly perpetuates a dangerous and inaccurate narrative about people's inherent morality and value based on their race.

The movie also seemingly encourages white viewers to see themselves as potential saviors without requiring them to grapple with their privilege or the systemic injustices that make such 'saving' necessary in the first place. It offers emotional satisfaction without demanding social responsibility or introspection. This is a problematic pattern because it allows people to engage with racial issues superficially without reflecting on their roles within broader systems of racial inequity.

Towards a More Authentic Narrative

What might a more responsible and authentic portrayal of Michael Oher's life have looked like? For starters, it might have delved deeper into his thoughts, feelings, and experiences, portraying him as the intelligent and capable individual he is rather than as a mere subject of the Tuohy family's kindness. It might have engaged seriously with the systemic issues that shaped his early life and might have portrayed the Tuohys not as saviors but as allies in his journey.

Filmmakers bear a great responsibility in an age where media wields immense influence. Stories like Michael Oher's deserve to be told, but they must be told in a way that respects the complexity of the individuals involved and the larger social contexts in which they live.

As viewers, we, too, have a role to play. We must critically engage with the media we consume, questioning not only what stories are told but how they are told and whose perspectives are centered. In doing so, we can move toward a world where films entertain, educate, challenge, and inspire in ways that align with the realities and dignity of the people whose stories they recount.

In conclusion, while "The Blind Side" delivers an emotionally compelling narrative, it falls short in its portrayal of racial dynamics and the lived experiences of its black protagonist. The path forward calls for a conscientious examination of these stories and a commitment to telling them with the nuance, respect, and authenticity they deserve.

The Power of Perspective and a Call for Change

One of the most pressing issues raised by "The Blind Side" is the matter of perspective. Whose story is it, and who gets to tell it? The film primarily situates the viewer within the perspective of Leigh Anne Tuohy and her family. While this choice aligns with mainstream storytelling conventions, it also marginalizes Michael Oher's voice. His dreams, internal struggles, inherent strength, and intelligence—these facets of his character are primarily hidden, overshadowed by the narrative that predominantly celebrates his white caregivers.

This brings forth the crucial question: How might "The Blind Side" have unfolded if it had been told from Michael Oher's perspective? If the camera and script had prioritized his voice, reflections, and journey—not as an object of a white family's benevolence but as a protagonist in his own right—we might have been presented with a very different movie. One that celebrates Michael's resilience, his agency in overcoming the systemic obstacles placed in his path, and his role in forging the life he has built.

Reimagining the Story

Such a reimagined film might delve into the psychological and emotional complexity of a young black man navigating a world that often seems designed to marginalize him. It might also provide a more affluent, more nuanced exploration of Leigh Anne Tuohy and her family's journey—one that acknowledges and grapples with their privilege and challenges them to confront the broader systems of inequality that shape the world in which they and Michael live. Rather than erasing the culture and community Michael comes from, this version of his story might engage profoundly and respectfully with it, highlighting the value and richness of his heritage without framing it as something to be escaped or left behind.

The Imperative of Intersectionality

Furthermore, a more nuanced portrayal of this story would recognize and explore the intersectionality of Michael's identity—not just his race, but his class, his experiences in the foster care system, his relationship with education, and more. It would consider the systemic barriers he has faced and portray his journey not as a mere product of white benevolence but as a testament to his strength, perseverance, and character.

The Role of Filmmakers

The story of "The Blind Side," as it was presented, is a manifestation of the choices made by those who crafted the film. Filmmakers, writers, and producers wield immense power in shaping the narratives that enter our cultural consciousness. They decide whose voices are amplified and whose are muted. They construct the lens through which we, as viewers, engage with and understand the world. It is imperative that these storytellers approach this power with a deep sense of responsibility, prioritizing authenticity, empathy, and respect for the individuals whose lives they are depicting.

An Invitation to Critical Engagement

As audiences, we are not merely passive consumers of these stories. We engage with them, critique them, and carry them into our interactions with the world. We, too, have a role in challenging and reshaping the narratives we are presented with. This means approaching films like "The Blind Side" with a critical, discerning eye—recognizing how they may perpetuate harmful stereotypes or oversimplify complex issues and advocating for more authentic, equitable, and respectful portrayals of people and their stories.

In conclusion, while "The Blind Side" may offer an emotionally charged viewing experience, it also serves as a poignant example of the profound need for stories that are told with authenticity and respect for the complexities of individual lives and broader social contexts. As viewers, storytellers, and members of a shared society, we are all called to participate in the critical, ongoing work of creating and promoting narratives that reflect the rich, multifaceted tapestry of human experience in all its depth and diversity.

What message does the story tell about Black people and stereotypes?

"The Blind Side" can be viewed as reinforcing several stereotypes about Black people, even as it aims to tell a heartwarming and uplifting story. While the film was undoubtedly intended to be an inspiring story of family, opportunity, and generosity, its presentation of its Black characters, particularly Michael Oher, often falls into familiar, problematic patterns that can subtly reinforce racial stereotypes and perpetuate a narrow and skewed depiction of Black individuals and their experiences. Below, we delve into some of the specific messages and stereotypes the movie may inadvertently communicate:

1. The Dependent Black Individual:

• The character of Michael Oher is introduced as a homeless and academically underperforming teenager. The film frames his subsequent achievements almost entirely as the result of the benevolent intervention of a white family. This can reinforce a harmful stereotype that suggests Black individuals are incapable of success without help from white individuals, casting them as dependent and lacking in agency.

2. The 'White Savior' Narrative:

• The film places a white family, the Tuohys, at the center of Oher's journey to success, depicting them as his saviors. This reinforces the 'white savior' stereotype—a narrative in which white characters rescue people of color from their troubled lives. Such narratives can subtly suggest that Black individuals need white individuals to save or redeem them.

3. The 'Gentle Giant' Stereotype:

• Throughout the movie, Michael is portrayed as a gentle, non-threatening figure, which seems aimed to counteract harmful stereotypes of Black men as aggressive or dangerous. However, this portrayal risks swinging to the opposite extreme, presenting him as passive and overly simplistic, which can diminish his complexity as a character and human being.

4. Cultural Erasure and Assimilation:

• Michael's journey in the movie is primarily depicted as assimilation into a wealthy, white world. His background, culture, and previous life are mostly erased or portrayed as something to move away from. This might imply, even if unintentionally, that success and acceptance for Black individuals require assimilation into white culture.

5. The Problematic Portrayal of Black Communities:

• The film's limited portrayal of other Black characters often falls into negative stereotypes. The Black community Michael comes from is depicted as impoverished and dangerous, without any significant counter-narrative or depth. This can contribute to a monolithic and negative portrayal of Black communities.

6. Silencing Black Voices:

• Michael Oher's character is notably quiet and reserved throughout much of the film, and much of his story is told from the perspective of the Tuohy family. This can be seen as a metaphorical silencing of Black voices and perspectives in their stories, a significant issue in media representations.

7. The Stereotype of Black Athleticism as a Ticket Out of Poverty:

• The movie implies that Oher's athletic prowess is his primary avenue for success and escaping poverty. This is a common trope that can perpetuate the notion that Black individuals can primarily or only achieve success through physical rather than intellectual means.

It is essential to note that stereotypes are not just harmful to their inaccuracies; they shape perceptions and behaviors, which can have tangible effects on people's lives. While "The Blind Side" aimed to be a touching and inspirational story, how it navigates, race and storytelling echoes larger, systemic issues in media representation that are worth serious discussion and critique.

Image courtesy of Warner Bros

 About Jim Woods
Jim Woods is the author of the bestselling diversity and inclusion book, “Unseen: Unmasking Bias and Embracing Diversity in Our Daily Lives: A Journey into Recognizing and Challenging Our Inherent Biases. He is also the President & CEO of Woods Kovalova Group, a diversity, equity & inclusion expert who helping organizations for over 20 years. He knows how to create an environment where everyone feels respected and valued – no matter who they are or their background. His work with Fortune 500 companies such as Cisco Systems, Microsoft, and Boeing demonstrates that he understands how major companies operate.

With this level of expertise, you can be confident that Jim will help your organization reach its goals of creating a safe and equitable workplace. In addition, his strategies have proven successful in inspiring corporate cultures worldwide to pursue true transformation toward anti-racism and social change within their ranks.

Reach out today to learn how partnerships with Jim’s team at Woods Kovalova Group can make meaningful changes in your organization’s culture!